Hydrogen Research Study
← Back to Research Library
Human clinical evidenceUncontrolled human studyHydrogen inhalation

Hydrogen Gas Treatment Improves Postoperative Delirium and Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Noncardiac Patients.

Lin H, Du J, Tian Z, Yu Y, Cui Y, Xie K · Journal of personalized medicine · 2022

Research-use notice

Independent study record

Each H2HUBB study page organizes source-linked research details for educational use. Interpretation should remain proportional to the study design, population, controls, and limitations.

H2HUBB Research Library branded molecular hydrogen research image
Primary topic Cardiovascular Health
Evidence type Human clinical evidence
Publication type Uncontrolled human study
Hydrogen method Hydrogen inhalation
hydrogen inhalation cardiovascular health study 2022 lin research summary

The publication “Hydrogen Gas Treatment Improves Postoperative Delirium and Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Noncardiac Patients.” is organized in H2HUBB under the research focus hydrogen inhalation cardiovascular health study 2022 lin. The publication is cited as Lin H, Du J, Tian Z, Yu Y, Cui Y, Xie K, Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. This uncontrolled human study examined Hydrogen Gas Treatment Improves Postoperative Delirium and Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Noncardiac Patients. The abstract describes Human participants; hydrogen delivered as hydrogen inhalation. The abstract reports: Results: Postoperative delirium occurred in 17 (24%) of 70 patients without hydrogen inhalation and in 10 (12%) of 83 patients after hydrogen inhalation. This is an automated editorial draft based on the abstract and requires source review before publication.

Hydrogen inhalation cardiovascular health study 2022 lin overview

Purpose: Postoperative delirium is a state of acute brain dysfunction characterized by fluctuating mental status that affects millions of patients each year. Because this is human clinical evidence, relevance depends on participant selection, controls, sample size, treatment duration, adherence, outcome measures, and replication.

Study design and hydrogen intervention

Publication type: Uncontrolled human study. Evidence type: Human clinical evidence. Research model or population: Human participants. Randomized: Yes. Blinding: Unknown. Control status: Control group reported.

Delivery method: Hydrogen inhalation.

Reported findings and scientific interpretation

For this hydrogen inhalation cardiovascular health study 2022 lin, the study record reports the following: The abstract reports: Results: Postoperative delirium occurred in 17 (24%) of 70 patients without hydrogen inhalation and in 10 (12%) of 83 patients after hydrogen inhalation.

These findings should be interpreted as one piece of evidence rather than as a stand-alone medical conclusion. Results can be influenced by the research model, study design, treatment protocol, sample size, outcome selection, statistical methods, and whether the findings have been independently reproduced.

How this research record was prepared

H2HUBB organizes bibliographic details, study design information, intervention data, outcomes, limitations, and safety notes from the available scientific source. Automated classification supports database organization, but it does not replace critical reading of the complete paper. Source identifiers, evidence labels, and delivery-method fields are retained so readers can verify the record and compare it with related publications. A missing field means the information was unavailable or not reported in the structured source; it should not be treated as a negative finding.

Limitations, safety, and original source

Limitations: The abstract alone may not report all methodological limitations; full-text review is required.

Safety: The abstract did not provide detailed safety or adverse-event information.

This H2HUBB page is an educational research record, not medical advice. Review the original scientific source for the complete methods and results. Continue exploring the H2HUBB Molecular Hydrogen Research Library to compare evidence types, delivery methods, and related topics.