Hydrogen gas therapy: A promising approach for sepsis management post-burn injury by modulating inflammation, oxidative stress, and wound healing.
Yu P, Hong N, Wang G, Chen S, Zhao Z · CytoJournal · 2025
Research-use notice
Independent study record
Each H2HUBB study page organizes source-linked research details for educational use. Interpretation should remain proportional to the study design, population, controls, and limitations.

The publication “Hydrogen gas therapy: A promising approach for sepsis management post-burn injury by modulating inflammation, oxidative stress, and wound healing.” is organized in H2HUBB under the research focus hydrogen inhalation inflammation immune study 2025 yu. The publication is cited as Yu P, Hong N, Wang G, Chen S, Zhao Z, CytoJournal, 2025. This uncontrolled human study examined Hydrogen gas therapy: A promising approach for sepsis management post-burn injury by modulating inflammation, oxidative stress, and wound healing. The abstract describes Human participants; hydrogen delivered as hydrogen inhalation. The abstract reports: Wound healing was monitored, with wound contraction rates recorded and histological assessments conducted using hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's trichrome staining to evaluate tissue…. This is an automated editorial draft based on the abstract and requires source review before publication.
Hydrogen inhalation inflammation immune study 2025 yu overview
This study aimed to investigate the mechanisms by which hydrogen gas treatment exerts its effects on postburn sepsis, with a focus on its influence… Animal research can identify biological effects and support future investigation, but it cannot by itself establish safety or effectiveness in humans.
Study design and hydrogen intervention
Publication type: Animal study. Evidence type: Preclinical animal evidence. Research model or population: Sprague-Dawley rat burn-sepsis model with rat fibroblast in vitro component. Blinding: Unknown. Control status: Control group reported.
Delivery method: Hydrogen inhalation.
Reported findings and scientific interpretation
For this hydrogen inhalation inflammation immune study 2025 yu, the study record reports the following: The abstract reports: Wound healing was monitored, with wound contraction rates recorded and histological assessments conducted using hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's trichrome staining to evaluate tissue…
These findings should be interpreted as one piece of evidence rather than as a stand-alone medical conclusion. Results can be influenced by the research model, study design, treatment protocol, sample size, outcome selection, statistical methods, and whether the findings have been independently reproduced.
How this research record was prepared
H2HUBB organizes bibliographic details, study design information, intervention data, outcomes, limitations, and safety notes from the available scientific source. Automated classification supports database organization, but it does not replace critical reading of the complete paper. Source identifiers, evidence labels, and delivery-method fields are retained so readers can verify the record and compare it with related publications. A missing field means the information was unavailable or not reported in the structured source; it should not be treated as a negative finding.
Limitations, safety, and original source
Limitations: The abstract alone may not report all methodological limitations; full-text review is required.
Safety: The abstract did not provide detailed safety or adverse-event information.
This H2HUBB page is an educational research record, not medical advice. Review the original scientific source for the complete methods and results. Continue exploring the H2HUBB Molecular Hydrogen Research Library to compare evidence types, delivery methods, and related topics.